I.
Some Basic Concept
I.1.
Definitions of Morphology
According to Crystal (1980:232-233)
Morphology is the branch of grammar which studies the structure of words,
primarily through the use of morphem construct.
Morphology
can be divided in two branches is :
The
study of inflection (inflectional morphology).
Word
formation (lexical or derivational morphology).
As
with any other area of linguistic theory, we must distinguish between general morphology
and the morphology of a particular language. General morphological theory is
concerned with delimiting exactly what types of morphological rules can be
found in natural languages. The morphology of a particular language, on the
other hand, is a set of rules with a dual function. First, these rules are
responsible for word formation, the formation of new words. Second, they
represent the speaker’s unconscious knowledge of the internal structure of the
already existing words of their language.
I.2.
Words and Morphemes
What is word ? O’ Grady and Dobrovolsky
(1989:90-91) state that the word is best defined in terms of the way in which
it patterns syntactically. In this way, the word can be defined as a minimal
free form. A free form is an element that can occur in isolation and/or
whose position with respect to neighboring elements is not fixed.
Words, though they may be definable as minimal
free forms, are not minimal meaningful units of language we are looking for,
since they are often broken down further. In linguistic, these minimal
meaningful units are called morphemes. A word may consist of one or more
morphemes. The word friend, for example, only consists of one morpheme; the
word friendly consists of two morphemes , and the word friendliness consists of
three morphemes. Thus, the difference between words and morphemes can be stated
that all (simple) words are morphemes, but not all morphemes are words.
I.3.
Free and Bound Morphemes
According to whether they can stand
alone or not, morphemes can be divided into free morphemes and bound
morphemes. Free morphemes are all morphemes that can stand alone, namely,
morphemes which can constitute words by themselves; and bound morphemes are all
morphemes which must attach to other elements. Roots or stems usually belong to
free morphemes, whereas affixes belong to bound morphemes.
I.4.
Morpheme, Morph, and Allomorph
Bauer (1983:13-16) defines a
morpheme as the minimal unit of grammatical analysis; a morph as a segment of a
word-form which represents a particular morpheme; and an allomorph as a
phonetically, lexically, or grammatically conditioned member of a set of morphs
representing a particular morpheme.
I.5.
Inflection and Derivation
According to O’Grady and Dobrovolsky
(1989:108-109), the differences between inflection and derivation are as
follows :
First, inflection does not change the
grammatical category of the word to which it applies, whereas derivation
changes the category and/or the meaning of the form to which it applies.
Example
:
[[book]n
s]
[[hospital] ize]
Second, a derivational affix (DA) must
be closer to the root than an inflection affix (IA).
Example
: neigh hood s
Root DA IA
This
example shows that inflection takes place after all word formation processes,
including derivation.
Third, based on their productivity,
inflectional affixes typically have very few exceptions, whereas derivational
affixes characteriscally apply to restricted classes of stem.
II.
Word Structure
Complex words have an internal
structure. The complex word denationalization, for example, contains
five morphemes: de nation al ize ation. Nation is a free
morpheme, because it can stand alone as a word, while the others are bound
morphemes. The negative affix de- attaches to verbs and forms
other than verbs; the affix –al forms adjectives from nouns; the
affix –ize forms verbs from adjectives; and the affix –ation
forms nouns from verbs.
To show the
internal structure of this word, these parts or morphemes must be put together
in a particular way, with particular arrangement and order. The order is so
strict because each of the bound morphemes is an affix. Furthermore, each affix
attaches only to a particular lexical category (either N or V or Adj), called
its base, and result in another particular lexical category.
III.
Word Formation
According to
O’Grady and Dobrovolsky (1989:100), the two most common types of word formation
are :
a.
Derivation.
Derivation is the process by which
a new words is built from a base, usually thriugh the addition of an
affix.Derivation creates a new word by changing the category and or meaning of
the base to which it applies. The derivational affix –er , for
example : Verb Derived noun
[help] [[help]
er]
[teach] [[teach]
er]
(1)
English Derivational Affixes.
In the following table ,
O’Grady and Dobrovolsky (1989:97) list some of the English derivational affixes
:
Affixes
Prefix change Semantic effect Example
-ation V- N the result of “X”ing realization
-er V-N one who X’s worker
Etc.
(2)
Word-Formation Rules.
Each line in the preceding table is
basically a word-formation rule which predicts how words may be formed in
English. Thus, if there is a rule whereby the prefix un- may be
added to an adjective X, resulting in another adjective X, un X, with the
meaning ‘not x’, then we predict that an adjective like harmonious
may be combined with this prefix to form the adjective unharmonious,
which means ‘not harmonious’
b.
Compounding.
Compounding is a process involving
the combination of two words (with or without accompanying affixes) to generate
a new word. Compounding is very productive in English. In English, compounds
can be found in all the major lexical categories-nouns (doorstop), verb
(stagemanage), adjevtives (winedark)-but nouns are by far the most common type
of compounds.
Structurally,
two features of compounds are clear. One is fact that the constituent members
of a compound are not equal.
The
second structural feature of compounds is that a compound never has more than
two constituent. This is not to say that a compound may never consist of more
than two.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar